SEEMO:As a journalist, you’ve experienced serious threats several times. Please tell us about your experiences.
Drago Hedl: Luckily, the threats I’ve received were more verbal. Two times I found these threats to be very serious: once during the 1990’s when Branimir Glavaš, a powerful Croatian politician at the time, said that he would turn me ‘into dust’ because of articles I published about his involvement in war crimes in Osijek.
The other serious threat came from Davor Boras in 2006, when he attacked me verbally and very vulgarly in a public place, threating to kill me ‘like a dog’. At the time, Boras was the youth president of the Croat Democratic Alliance of Slavonija and Baranja (HDSSB), a political party formed by Branimir Glavaš. Boras received a probation sentence for these threats. I also took a statement by General Mladen Kruljć seriously, when he said in an interview that General Slavko Barić tried to talk him into killing me after I wrote several articles about him. I was also threatened several times by mail. I received the latest one two days after the terrorist attack on Charlie Hebdo magazine.
SEEMO:What is it like to live with threats? Did they affect your life personally or as a journalist?
Drago Hedl: Threats are uncomfortable and always cause commotion. I find it particularly problematic that my also family had to go through hard times because of them. Especially my mother, later in her life. She died last year. I tried to keep these threats from affecting my personal life, so I never stopped appearing publically or visiting places I’d been to before I was threatened.
SEEMO:Have threats caused you to consider not writing about certain topics, or to censor yourself?
Drago Hedl: I’m sure the threats haven’t affected my journalistic work in the sense of self-censorship, or avoiding complex topics which could result in threats by the people depicted in my articles.
SEEMO:To what extent did the state protect you?
Drago Hedl: I reported all the threats I received to the police. They conducted their work professionally. On two occasions, when they assumed the threats were extremely dangerous, I was put under 24-hour police protection. When I reported the anonymous letter I received after the attack on Charlie Hebdo magazine, the police reacted promptly, sending a forensic expert to search for fingerprints on my mailbox, and they began a very intense criminal investigation.
SEEMO:How significant was SEEMO support to you?
Drago Hedl: SEEMO reactions and support were very significant to me, not only in a moral sense, but they also contributed to quicker reactions by state institutions. That type of pressure from international organizations towards Croatian authorities is very important because it shows that the case is being followed outside of Croatia. That’s why I’m always thankful to SEEMO and other organizations that protect media freedom and human rights for always reacting quickly when I was endangered for doing my job as a journalist.
SEEMO:What is your advice to younger colleagues who may experience threats? What should they do?
Drago Hedl: It is important to report every threat. Even though the aim of these threats is usually to scare the journalist and stop him from further investigation, we still can’t be sure that those who are issuing the threats aren’t serious. Besides the police, it is important to report them to organizations that deal with media freedom, such as SEEMO, because their reactions help to ensure a more efficient investigation by authorities in Croatia.